ONE PUNCH GOD
But why do I even bother/
'Insanity' is the name I give to human consciousness.
There have been few moments that I have spent hastily. There have been even fewer counted among those I've experienced in lucidity.
I am truthfully so very uncertain…
Fresh new Egoist meme. Do with it as you please.
We begin suffering when the external world begins to exist for us… Then we suffer excessively until it dissipates.
It is out of personal gain by way of emotional fulfillment and relief that we seek out entertainment of all kinds. It is the same kind of personal gain that motivates people to entertain and create content for those people seeking it. And though the gains could be presented materially (as it is in the case of business dealings) it doesn't mean you can assume the value of it in someone else's mind by assigning your own value to it because you cannot change that the value of all items, resources, and information, along with larger concepts such as life, freedom, and even value itself are individually subjective.
The Leaves of Leisure
So, why isn't uploading audio a thing yet? I mean, we can upload video but not audio? I think that needs to change,
The Voluntarist spirit is an attitude of mind or a sense of life, if you will, which animates those engaged in the struggle for the recognition of self-ownership rights and the demise of the State. It is the passionate disinterested love of justice for its own sake, regardless of the consequences which the struggle brings to one personally. It is a knowledge that if one takes care of the means that the end will take care of itself. It is an understanding that the morality and principles of voluntary interaction with other self-owners is the only practical manner of living life upon this earth. It is an epistemological rejection of violence, a knowledge that coercion can never rationally convince. Come what will, wherever the chips may fall, voluntaryism seeks the perfect way but it differs from other philosophies of life in seeking it with utter disinterestedness. Right means are an end in themselves, their own reward.
A Hierarchy is a system or organization in which individuals or groups of individuals are ranked one above the other according to status or authority. Most schools of Anarchist thought argue that all hierarchies are unethical and should be abolished altogether.
"If a given individual seems most interested in vilifying others, proceeds to characterize his own in-group as having been unduly victimized, is ruthlessly vindictive, and finally, is discovered to have cozy, self-serving financial deals, there are reasonable grounds to assume that a person is more than a little Machiavellian and that his or her leadership may be aimed more toward self than public service."
Jeff Sessions to clamp down on makers of 3D guns - Axios
Is there a name for when you realize that when you regret not doing something differently and you in turn also regret what you did instead and also realize that that carries on to every decision you'll ever make, ensuring you will never ever truly find fulfillment in your life nor any aspect of it? I'd describe it as some sort of future thought depression or really just self pointlessness.
I just love his sassyness. kinda turns me on.😐
what do you guys think of this?
so uhh.. guess I'm back. heard this app got a little better.
Well.. the time has come for me to leave this app since that's really all I see Sola as now. It's just an app. No more community. No more information. Just bullshit.
About to start this book. If any of you have read it can you tell me what you think of it?
The utilitarian position - that Government dictation is bad because no rational ethics exists, and therefore no person has a right to impose his arbitrary values on someone else - is, we believe, an inadequate one. In the first place, it will not convince those who believe in a rational ethics, who believe that there is a scientific basis for moral judgements and that they are not pure whim. And furthermore, the position involves a hidden moral assumption of its own - that A has no right to impose any arbitrary values on B. But if ends are arbitrary, is not the end "that arbitrary whims not be imposed by coercion" just as arbitrary?