Sola
beta
5 months

For many of the entities driving the global warming debate, the goal has never been about climate.

For many of the entities driving the global warming debate, the goal has never been about climate. Their long-term goal is to unite the world under a single socialistic government in which there is no capitalism, no democracy, and, ultimately, no freedom.

For many of the entities driving the global warming debate, the goal has never been about climate. Their long-term goal is to unite the world under a single socialistic government in which there is no capitalism, no democracy, and, ultimately, no freedom. United Nations’ treaties such as the Paris Agreement on climate change are the flagships of the global governance agenda.

For many of the entities driving the global warming debate, the goal has never been about climate. Their long-term goal is to unite the world under a single socialistic government in which there is no capitalism, no democracy, and, ultimately, no freedom. United Nations’ treaties such as the Paris Agreement on climate change are the flagships of the global governance agenda. By controlling carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, they are in fact controlling the world’s energy since over 80% of our energy comes from CO 2 -emitting fossil fuels.

For many of the entities driving the global warming debate, the goal has never been about climate. Their long-term goal is to unite the world under a single socialistic government in which there is no capitalism, no democracy, and, ultimately, no freedom. United Nations’ treaties such as the Paris Agreement on climate change are the flagships of the global governance agenda. By controlling carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, they are in fact controlling the world’s energy since over 80% of our energy comes from CO 2 -emitting fossil fuels. And controlling the world’s energy effectively controls the world.

For many of the entities driving the global warming debate, the goal has never been about climate. Their long-term goal is to unite the world under a single socialistic government in which there is no capitalism, no democracy, and, ultimately, no freedom. United Nations’ treaties such as the Paris Agreement on climate change are the flagships of the global governance agenda. By controlling carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, they are in fact controlling the world’s energy since over 80% of our energy comes from CO 2 -emitting fossil fuels. And controlling the world’s energy effectively controls the world. Individual freedom is fueled by access to affordable energy.

So, for those seeking global governance, a shorter-term goal has become to limit the amount of energy that is available and place it under government control.

So, for those seeking global governance, a shorter-term goal has become to limit the amount of energy that is available and place it under government control. The wide availability of inexpensive fossil fuels is a serious obstacle to this vision.

So, for those seeking global governance, a shorter-term goal has become to limit the amount of energy that is available and place it under government control. The wide availability of inexpensive fossil fuels is a serious obstacle to this vision. Renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power are incapable of ever meeting the world’s energy needs.

So, for those seeking global governance, a shorter-term goal has become to limit the amount of energy that is available and place it under government control. The wide availability of inexpensive fossil fuels is a serious obstacle to this vision. Renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power are incapable of ever meeting the world’s energy needs. Their cost, which must be heavily subsidized by the taxpayer, their intermittency (power generation is interrupted when the wind doesn’t blow or the sun goes behind a cloud), and their limited capacity rule them out as major energy sources.

The public needs to wake up to this reality because energy impacts every facet of our lives and the war against fossil fuels is already taking a high toll.

The public needs to wake up to this reality because energy impacts every facet of our lives and the war against fossil fuels is already taking a high toll. Yet, in many states, energy costs are rising because public utilities are being forced by governments to replace some existing economical power with solar and wind farms.

The public needs to wake up to this reality because energy impacts every facet of our lives and the war against fossil fuels is already taking a high toll. Yet, in many states, energy costs are rising because public utilities are being forced by governments to replace some existing economical power with solar and wind farms. As usual, low-income families and small businesses are the biggest losers.

The public needs to wake up to this reality because energy impacts every facet of our lives and the war against fossil fuels is already taking a high toll. Yet, in many states, energy costs are rising because public utilities are being forced by governments to replace some existing economical power with solar and wind farms. As usual, low-income families and small businesses are the biggest losers. Under the Obama administration, nearly 75,000 new federal regulations restricting energy providers were created, costing America hundreds of billions of dollars per year.

The good news is that President Trump has reversed this dangerous trend, weakening or outright cancelling many of the Obama era rules.

The good news is that President Trump has reversed this dangerous trend, weakening or outright cancelling many of the Obama era rules. This may be difficult to sustain beyond the Trump presidency since the objectivity of major government agencies has been seriously compromised by the global warming movement.

All agencies that handle activities relating to climate, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and the Environmental Protection Agency have become so heavily politicized that any project, scientist, or activity that can be remotely connected to global warming is forced to align with the alarmist movement.

All agencies that handle activities relating to climate, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and the Environmental Protection Agency have become so heavily politicized that any project, scientist, or activity that can be remotely connected to global warming is forced to align with the alarmist movement. The integrity of science and scientists has also declined in recent years.

All agencies that handle activities relating to climate, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and the Environmental Protection Agency have become so heavily politicized that any project, scientist, or activity that can be remotely connected to global warming is forced to align with the alarmist movement. The integrity of science and scientists has also declined in recent years. Scientists understand that, if they want to receive research funding, publish papers, and even retain their jobs, they must support the global warming movement.

The net result is a loss of credibility for all scientists and the propagation of numerous falsehoods regarding global warming.

The net result is a loss of credibility for all scientists and the propagation of numerous falsehoods regarding global warming. Even so, a broad spectrum of meteorologists and other scientists have spoken out to say that there is no compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that humans are the cause of any climate changes observed in modern times.

The net result is a loss of credibility for all scientists and the propagation of numerous falsehoods regarding global warming. Even so, a broad spectrum of meteorologists and other scientists have spoken out to say that there is no compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that humans are the cause of any climate changes observed in modern times. Personal freedoms are declining as a result of the climate scare as well.

The net result is a loss of credibility for all scientists and the propagation of numerous falsehoods regarding global warming. Even so, a broad spectrum of meteorologists and other scientists have spoken out to say that there is no compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that humans are the cause of any climate changes observed in modern times. Personal freedoms are declining as a result of the climate scare as well. Socialists are using global warming to attack freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The net result is a loss of credibility for all scientists and the propagation of numerous falsehoods regarding global warming. Even so, a broad spectrum of meteorologists and other scientists have spoken out to say that there is no compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that humans are the cause of any climate changes observed in modern times. Personal freedoms are declining as a result of the climate scare as well. Socialists are using global warming to attack freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Several U.S. states are trying to pass unconstitutional legislation that would make it a crime to speak out against man-caused global warming.

The California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016 would have permitted prosecutors to sue think tanks, fossil fuel companies, and others that have “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.” After passing two state Senate committees, it was finally taken off the Senate floor but can be reconsidered at a later date.

The California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016 would have permitted prosecutors to sue think tanks, fossil fuel companies, and others that have “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.” After passing two state Senate committees, it was finally taken off the Senate floor but can be reconsidered at a later date. Socialists are also trying to place all energy sources under government control using a ‘smart grid’ that will eventually be able to monitor and dictate the energy use of all Americans.

The California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016 would have permitted prosecutors to sue think tanks, fossil fuel companies, and others that have “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.” After passing two state Senate committees, it was finally taken off the Senate floor but can be reconsidered at a later date. Socialists are also trying to place all energy sources under government control using a ‘smart grid’ that will eventually be able to monitor and dictate the energy use of all Americans. Global warming represents the most pervasive and damaging example of scientific fraud in history.

It has already seriously damaged the United States and other free market economies.

It has already seriously damaged the United States and other free market economies. While our economy is booming now, it will continue to be threatened as long as our government bases any of its policies on the global warming movement.

It has already seriously damaged the United States and other free market economies. While our economy is booming now, it will continue to be threatened as long as our government bases any of its policies on the global warming movement. ___ Dr. Jay Lehr is the Science Director of The Heartland Institute which is based in Arlington Heights, Illinois.

It has already seriously damaged the United States and other free market economies. While our economy is booming now, it will continue to be threatened as long as our government bases any of its policies on the global warming movement. ___ Dr. Jay Lehr is the Science Director of The Heartland Institute which is based in Arlington Heights, Illinois. Tom Harris is Executive Director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition.

It has already seriously damaged the United States and other free market economies. While our economy is booming now, it will continue to be threatened as long as our government bases any of its policies on the global warming movement. ___ Dr. Jay Lehr is the Science Director of The Heartland Institute which is based in Arlington Heights, Illinois. Tom Harris is Executive Director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition. Portions of this article have been excerpted with permission of the publisher and author of the 2018 book THE MYTHOLOGY OF GLOBAL WARMING by Bruce Bunker, Ph.D., Publisher: Moonshine Cove.

1834votes
6.036SOL earned
Vote
Share
Vote
Share
8
93
1834
USA, West Saint Paul
8 comments
Hanover Fiste
I have to say both. But the rhetoric and politics is a bigger "immediate" threat. We really do need to take care of our planet, but we can't just jump off cliffs and die so the planet can survive with nobody left to enjoy it. I recently saw a card talking about overpopulation. Some actually argued that it's not a problem and the planet can handle more people. Ok, maybe it can "sustain and feed" more, but it will also take more damage. The big problem is the fact that it doesn't have an end. It keeps on growing. It's short sighted to say we can handle 10 billion. Well, ok, but it doesn't stop there, it will be 20 then 30 then 50 when will it become a problem? If the climate alarmists have their way, we can only sustain about 4 billion people. Half the world must die. But we have to provide insurance and make everyone live longer! Wtf? You can't have it both ways!
B Samson [WildFyre]
You are advocating canceling insurance.?
Hanover Fiste
B Samson [WildFyre], 🤣 no. But you can't tout universal while fighting climate change. Just being alive causes global warming. I don't care how green you think you are.
Fretless 🎸
Hanover Fiste, on the other side certain people are against birth control... The less educated a population is, the higher the birth rate is. Guess in what we should invest first to save the planet 😁
Hanover Fiste
Fretless 🎸, great point. I personally think abortion is immoral, but politically I don't think it's moral to push your morals on others. I would be pro life, but the other side seems to want their choice pretty bad. When you consider the fact that abortion would still happen, and would be unsafe, I think it's better to remain legal. There are a lot of immoral things that are legal. Cheating on your spouse is legal, for example.
Fretless 🎸
Hanover Fiste, abortion was not the first I was thinking about, more about the prevention in advance. Especially within fast growing populations. Abortion should be the least but legal way in my opinion but not a kind of a standard for a irresponsible birth control. Abortion is a sensitive theme and I don't think that I'm able to discuss this deeply because I'm not a woman. I would say that women should discuss this on a political and moral level primarily. I was a teenage father and became a very young grandfather so I know at least the difficulties and challenges on the side of non abortion 😁
Hanover Fiste
Fretless 🎸, good point. But woman or not, I know enough pro life women to know that you only need to be human to respect the life of a human. Calling it anything but human is an excuse to make the conscience feel better. Still, I respect the right to choose, and I would never judge someone for making that choice. However I would judge someone who makes a joke of it.
B Samson [WildFyre]
Hanover Fiste, fighting the weather? Just think, one day you are going to be a paper pushers choice to save or not
Write something...
Send